The Constellation of Pavo

Pavo is a circumpolar constellation if viewed from mid-latitudes in the southern hemisphere. The brightest star in the constellation of Pavo is the Peacock – Alpha Pavonis, though it is commonly referred to as the eye of the peacock (Whyte, 1928, p. 264).

Image comparison so you can see where Pavo is in the southern sky (images by Haritina Mogoşanu)

The rest of the constellation comprises less prominent stars. It’s in the group of constellations surrounding the South Celestial Pole – with Apus, Octans and Chamaeleon in the middle, and Pavo is in the next ring of constellations out. It sits between Octans and Sagittarius and is circumpolar if viewed from Star Safari Observatory.

The Stars of Pavo

The area bounded by Pavo contains few particularly bright stars, other than Peacock. In the Full Moon, the stars ascribed to the various Pavo asterisms are visible, but the observer must use observational techniques like averted vision.

Star chart of Pavo, made with Cartes du Ciel.

The most prominent star in Pavo is the bright sunlike star, Peacock. Also known as Alpha Pavonis, it got the name Peacock from the Royal Air Force (RAF) Navigation Almanac. The RAF had insisted on names for stars; since Alpha Pavonis didn’t have a name, it was given one (Sadler, 2008, p. 48). Peacock is a hot blue star with the spectral class B2 IV and a visual magnitude 1.918 (Hogg et al, 2000). It has a surface temperature of around 19,000K and is 180 light-years away (van Leeuwen, 2007). That temperature means the star looks a little blue, hence its spectral class of B2. The IV means it is in the sub-giant phase of the life cycle. This occurs when the star starts to run out of hydrogen in the core to fuse, and it starts to expand. The star is also binary with a smaller companion star (Vidal-Madjar et al, 1988, p. 274).

Pavo is more than just the eye of the peacock; the other stars have some interesting characteristics, including binaries and red giants.

Asterisms of Pavo

Observers of the night sky generally recognise various patches in the sky by the asterisms they are familiar with. The asterisms associated with Pavo include a rough outline of a peacock and other combinations of lines between stars. There is also a lesser-known asterism that resembles a saucepan. As this part of the sky doesn’t have many bright stars, there are not a lot of published references to this area beyond European sources. Examination of oral traditions in the southern hemisphere is an area that needs a lot more work.

Deep Sky Objects Visible in Pavo

There are two prominent deep sky objects in Pavo, NGC 6744 and NGC 6752 (McIntyre et al, 2024, p. 161). NGC 6744 is a prominent spiral galaxy, and NGC 6752 is a globular cluster. The galaxy is relatively easy to find, about a quarter of the way along a line between Lambda and Delta Pavonis. Similarly, NGC 6752 is about a quarter of the way along a line from Lambda Pavonis to Peacock.

In our 405mm reflecting telescopes, the NGC 6744 is evident with a bright core with a diffuse haze around it; the spiral arms are not easy to see, but in ideal conditions, an observer can see some variation in the haze around the core. The distance to the galaxy is about 30 million light-years (Tully et al, 2023). The globular cluster NGC 6752 is easier to see and visible even during a Full Moon. The distance to NGC 6752 is about 14,500 light-years (Gratton et al, 2003, p. 538).

A triangle between Delta, Gamma and Epsilon Pavonis bounds a group of 11th magnitude galaxies. With a powerful telescope, these galaxies are great to try and find, though you will need a dark sky and no Moon.

Image of NGC 6744 taken in Wairarapa by the Sam Leske.

History of Pavo

The International Astronomical Union (IAU) defines a constellation as an area of the sky marked by boundaries with the 88 constellations first noted in 1922 (International Astronomical Union, 1922, p. 179). The boundaries are defined by points positioned on the Celestial Sphere at specific Right Ascension and Declination coordinates (Delporte, 1930). This is distinct from the patterns interpreted from the arrangement of stars. The IAU sector for Pavo inherits its name from a group of stars noted by the Dutch navigator Pieter Dirkszoon Keyser (Sawyer Hogg, 1951, p. 215). Keyser’s observations were most likely the basis for the star map produced by Peter Plancius in 1594 that was called “Orbis terrarum typus de integro multis in locis emendatus Petro Plancio, 1594” (Knobel, 1917, p. 414).

Pavo is Latin for Peacock, and the IAU decided in their 1922 meeting to keep the constellation names in Latin (International Astronomical Union, 1922, p. 179). The origins of how the constellation was called The Peacock are a little unclear. It all seemed to start with the desire of Dutch astronomer Petrus Plancius to map the southern sky, which at the time was largely unknown to Europeans. He relied on the observations made by Pieter Dirkszoon Keyser, who seems to have been under Plancius’ instruction before embarking on his voyages to the Indian Ocean (Knobel, 1917, p. 420).

The catalogue of stars returned to Plancius was then used to depict the southern sky on an engraved celestial globe by Jodocus Hondius. It seems that Plancius chose the peacock and other birds to make constellations from the stars that Keyser sent back (Dekker, 1987, p. 467). The new constellations essentially recorded the species of birds that the Dutch navigators had encountered in their voyages to Southeast Asia.

The story doesn’t end there; the complicating factor is trying to unpick how the Pavo stars got catalogued and named, ultimately making it into Bayer’s Uranometria. The discussion must also include Frederick de Houtmann, who was on the same voyage as Keyser and also on a subsequent journey. During these voyages, he claimed to have measured the data he later published in his catalogue of stars as an appendix to a dictionary on the Malaysian and Malagasy languages (Verbunt & Gent, 2011, p. 1).

Depiction of de Houtmann’s published data (in red) and Kepler’s data in (blue) (Verbunt & Gent 2011, p. 18).

The star catalogue compiled by de Houtmann did not use the Greek letter followed by the constellation name as Bayer did on some of the stars he depicted. The main question is whether Bayer used de Houtmann’s data or Keyser’s; it was probably a combination of both. Plancius used Keyser’s data to depict the peacock in Hondius’ globe, and the peacock made it into Bayer’s drawings. The data that de Houtmann published was the basis for where Bayer put the stars. Did de Houtmann copy Keyser’s data to get the positions, or did he measure them himself? We don’t know, but de Houtmann knew mathematics and astronomy, so it was likely within his ability to make the measurements himself (de Grijs, p. 13).

Peacocks are popular throughout Europe and can be found in the environments of many wealthy estates. In the late 1500s, they would have been a rarity and exotic, so immortalising the bird in the sky may have been a tribute to Dutch maritime trade power.

Pavo depicted in Bayer’s Uranometria (Bayer, 1603, p. 156)

References

Bayer, J 1603, Uranometria, Zurich.

Chevalley, P 2019, Cartes du Ciel, <https://www.ap-i.net/skychart/>.

Dekker, E 1987, ‘Early explorations of the southern celestial sky’, Annals of Science, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 439-70

Delporte, E 1930, Délimitation Scientifique Des Constellations (Tables et Cartes), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Gratton, R, Bragaglia, A, Carretta, E, Clementini, G, Desidera, S, Grundahl, F & Lucatello, S 2003, ‘Distances and ages of NGC 6397, NGC 6752 and 47 Tuc*’, Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 408, pp. 529-43.

de Grijs, R 2023, ‘Early star charts of the Dutch East India Company’, Sydney.

Hog, E, Fabricius, C, Makarov, VV, Urban, S, Corbin, T, Wycoff, G, Bastian, U, Schwekendiek, P & Wicenec, A 2000, ‘The Tycho-2 Catalogue of the 2.5 million brightest stars*’, Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 355, pp. L27-L30.

International Astronomical Union, IA 1922, ‘Meeting of the International Astronomical Union at Rome 1922 May 2-10’, The Observatory, vol. 45, pp. 176-190.

Knobel, E 1917, ‘On Frederick de Houtman’s Catalogue of Southern Stars, and The Origin of the Southern Constellations’, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 414-432.

van Leeuwen, F 2007, ‘Validation of the new Hipparcos reduction’, Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 474, pp. 653-64.

McIntyre, M, Ridpath, I & Federman, R 2024, Stargazer’s Bible, William Collins, Malaysia.

Merula, P, Hondius, H & Elsevier, I 1621, Paulli G.F.P.N. Merulae Cosmographiae generalis libri tres : item Geographiae particularis libri quatuor, quibus Europa in genere, speciatim Hispania, Gallia, Italia, describuntur, Amsterodami : Apud Henricum Hondium.

Sadler, D 2008, A Personal History of H.M. Nautical Almanac Office, United Kingdom Hydrographic Office.

Sawyer Hogg, H 1951, ‘Out of Old Books (Pieter Dircksz Keijser, Delineator of the Southern Constellations)’, Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada, vol. 45, pp. 215-20.

Tully, R, Kourkchi, E, Courtois, H, Anand, G, Blakeslee, J, Brout, D, de Jaeger, T, Dupuy, A, Guinet, D, Howlett, C, Jensen, J, Pomarède, D, Rizzi, L, Rubin, D, Said, K, Scolnic, D & Stahl, B 2023, ‘Cosmicflows-4’, The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 944, no. 94, p. 31.

Vidal-Madjar, A, Ferlet, R, Spite, M & Coupry, M 1988, ‘Deuterirum in early-type stars. The case of Alpha Pavonis’, Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 201, pp. 273-5.

Whyte, C 1928, The Constellations and their History, Charles Griffin & Company Ltd, London.

Verbunt, F & van Gent, R 2011, ‘Early star catalogues of the southern sky’, Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 530, pp. 1-26.